Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) in African-American Community:
A Selected Annotated Bibliography
Colson ER, Levenson S, Rybin D, Calianos
C, Margolis A, Colton T, Lister G, Corwin MJ.
Barriers to following the supine sleep recommendation
among mothers at four centers for the Women, Infants, and
Children Program.
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug; 118(2):e243-50.
Objectives: The risk for sudden infant death
syndrome in black infants is twice that of white infants, and
their parents are less likely to place them in the supine position
for sleep. We previously identified barriers for parents to
follow recommendations for sleep position. Our objective with
this study was to quantify these barriers, particularly among
low-income, primarily black mothers. Design/Methods: We conducted
face-to-face interviews with 671 mothers, 64% of whom were
black, who attended Women, Infants, and Children Program centers
in Boston, Massachusetts, Dallas, Texas, Los Angeles, California,
and New Haven, Connecticut. We used univariate analyses to
quantify factors that were associated with choice of sleeping
position and multivariate logistic regression to calculate
adjusted odds ratios for the 2 outcome variables: "ever" (meaning
usually, sometimes, or last night) put infant in the prone
position for sleep and "usually" put infant in the supine position
to sleep. Results: Fifty-nine percent of mothers reported supine,
25% side, 15% prone, and 1% other as the usual position. Thirty-four
percent reported that they ever placed infants in the prone
position. Seventy-two percent said that a nurse, 53% a doctor,
and 38% a female friend or relative provided source of advice.
Only 42% reported that a nurse, only 36% a doctor, and only
15% a female friend or relative recommended the supine position
for sleep. When a female friend or relative recommended the
prone position, mothers were more likely ever to place their
infants in the prone position and less likely usually to choose
supine compared with those who received no advice from friends
or relatives. When a doctor or a nurse recommended a nonsupine
position, the mothers were less likely to choose supine compared
with those who received no advice from a doctor or a nurse.
Mothers who trusted the opinion of a doctor or a nurse about
infant sleeping position were more likely to place their infants
in the supine position. Half of the mothers believed that infants
were more likely to choke when supine, and they were less likely
to place their infants supine. Mothers who believed that infants
are more comfortable in the prone position (36%) were more
likely to place their infants prone. Twenty-nine percent believed
that having their infants sleep with an adult helps prevent
sudden infant death syndrome, and only 43% believed that sudden
infant death syndrome is related to sleeping position. Conclusions:
We identified specific barriers to placing infants in the supine
position for sleep (lack of or wrong advice, lack of trust
in providers, knowledge and concerns about safety and comfort)
in low-income, primarily black mothers that should be considered
when designing interventions to get more infants onto their
back for sleep.
Free full-text downloading available at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/2/e243
Plant LD, Bowers PN, Liu Q, Morgan T, Zhang
T, State MW, Chen W, Kittles RA, Goldstein SA.
A common cardiac sodium channel variant associated with sudden infant
death in African Americans, SCN5A S1103Y.
J Clin Invest. 2006 Feb; 116(2):430-5.
Thousands die each year from sudden infant
death syndrome (SIDS). Neither the cause nor basis for varied
prevalence in different populations is understood. While 2
cases have been associated with mutations in type Valpha, cardiac
voltage-gated sodium channels (SCN5A), the "Back to Sleep" campaign
has decreased SIDS prevalence, consistent with a role for environmental
influences in disease pathogenesis. Here we studied SCN5A in
African Americans. Three of 133 SIDS cases were homozygous
for the variant S1103Y. Among controls, 120 of 1,056 were carriers
of the heterozygous genotype, which was previously associated
with increased risk for arrhythmia in adults. This suggests
that infants with 2 copies of S1103Y have a 24-fold increased
risk for SIDS. Variant Y1103 channels were found to operate
normally under baseline conditions in vitro. As risk factors
for SIDS include apnea and respiratory acidosis, Y1103 and
wild-type channels were subjected to lowered intracellular
pH. Only Y1103 channels gained abnormal function, demonstrating
late reopenings suppressible by the drug mexiletine. The variant
appeared to confer susceptibility to acidosis-induced arrhythmia,
a gene-environment interaction. Overall, homozygous and rare
heterozygous SCN5A missense variants were found in approximately
5% of cases. If our findings are replicated, prospective genetic
testing of SIDS cases and screening with counseling for at-risk
families warrant consideration.
For Full-text: http://www.jci.org/cgi/reprint/116/2/430
Makielski JC.
SIDS: Genetic and environmental influences may cause
arrhythmia in this silent killer.
J Clin Invest. 2006 Feb; 116(2):297-9.
In this issue of the JCI, Bowers et al. show
that the common polymorphism of the cardiac voltage-gated sodium
channel, type Valpha (SCN5A), designated S1103Y, found in African
Americans is associated with an increased risk of sudden infant
death syndrome (SIDS). Wild-type and mutant SCN5A channels
both functioned typically under normal conditions in vitro,
but exposure to acidic intracellular pH levels such as those
found in respiratory acidosis--a known risk factor form SIDS--produced
abnormal gain-of function late reopening of S1103Y channels,
behavior that is often associated with cardiac arrhythmias.
These pathologic late reopenings were suppressed by low levels
of the channel-blocking drug mexiletine. These findings provide
an excellent illustration of a causal relationship between
the interaction of the environment and genetic background in
SIDS and also raise interesting questions about the linkage
of a genetic abnormality with a clinical phenotype.
Full-text downloading at: http://www.jci.org/cgi/reprint/116/2/299
Smith MP, Kaji A, Young KD, Gausche-Hill
M.
Presentation and survival of prehospital apparent
sudden infant death syndrome.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Apr-Jun; 9(2):181-5.
Background: Prehospital providers are often
involved in the resuscitation of apparent sudden infant death
syndrome (SIDS) victims; however, data are few on the presentation
and outcome of these patients. Objectives: To describe the
presentation and determine the survival rate of infants who
have an unwitnessed, prehospital arrest consistent with SIDS
(apparent SIDS), and to compare the presentation of infants
with a final diagnosis of SIDS with those who presented as
apparent SIDS but had a different final diagnosis. Methods:
This was a secondary analysis of data from a controlled trial
whose methodology has been previously described. The setting
was two large, urban emergency medical services (EMS) systems
of Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California. The population
included 113 apparent SIDS victims from the original interventional
study who had a prehospital, unwitnessed arrest consistent
with SIDS, defined by the scenario of an infant aged =12 months
being placed to sleep and later found in full arrest (pulseless
and apneic). Data collected included ethnicity, gender, arrest
etiology, signs of death (lividity, rigor mortis), prehospital
interventions, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), arrest
rhythm, code 3 transport (lights and sirens), and survival
to hospital discharge. RESULTS: One hundred ten of 113 apparent
SIDS patients had survival data; 0 of 110 (95% CI 0% to 3.3%)
survived, although ROSC was achieved in 5%; for three patients
data on survival were missing. Arrest rhythms were determined
in 94% of the subjects: asystole 87%, pulseless electrical
activity (PEA) 8%, and ventricular fibrillation 4%. Only 50
of 113 (44%) of the EMS records documented code 3 transport;
the remainder of the records were ambiguous. SIDS was the final
coroner's diagnosis for 79 of 113 (70%) of the cases. Other
causes of death in these apparent SIDS victims included respiratory
causes (12%), asphyxiation 3%), abuse (2%), congenital heart
disease (2%), sepsis (2%), other (4%), and unknown (5%). Apparent
SIDS victims with a final diagnosis of SIDS were more likely
to show signs of death (27/79, 34% vs. 5/34, 15%, p = 0.035)
and were less likely to have a rhythm of PEA (4/77, 5% vs.
5/31, 16%, p = 0.08), although the latter result was not statistically
significant. Conclusions: Apparent SIDS victims have a dismal
prognosis; all infants presenting with apparent SIDS died,
even the 30% whose final diagnosis was not SIDS. Given that
there were no survivors, new prehospital policies are needed
governing the use of lights and sirens, resuscitation decisions
including termination of resuscitation, provision of grief
support to families, and incident stress debriefing for prehospital
personnel.
Full-text available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com
Shields LB, Hunsaker DM, Muldoon S, Corey
TS, Spivack BS.
Risk factors associated with sudden unexplained infant
death: A prospective study of infant care practices in Kentucky.
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul; 116(1):e13-20.
Objective: To ascertain the prevalence of
infant care practices in a metropolitan community in the United
States with attention to feeding routines and modifiable risk
factors associated with sudden unexplained infant death (specifically,
prone sleeping position, bed sharing, and maternal smoking).
Methods: We conducted an initial face-to-face meeting followed
by a telephone survey of 189 women who gave birth at a level
I hospital in Kentucky between October 14 and November 10,
2002, and whose infants were placed in the well-infant nursery.
The survey, composed of questions pertaining to infant care
practices, was addressed to the women at 1 and 6 months postpartum.
Results: A total of 185 (93.9%) women participated in the survey
at 1 month, and 147 (75.1%) mothers contributed at 6 months.
The racial/ethnic composition of the study was 56.1% white,
30.2% black, and 16.4% biracial, Asian, or Hispanic. More than
half of the infants (50.8%) shared the same bed with their
mother at 1 month, which dramatically decreased to 17.7% at
6 months. Bed sharing was significantly more common among black
families compared with white families at both 1 month (adjusted
odds ratio [OR]: 5.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.71-13.02)
and 6 months (adjusted OR: 5.43; 95% CI: 2.05-14.35). Compared
with other races, white parents were more likely to place their
infants on their back before sleep at both 1 and 6 months.
Black parents were significantly less likely to place their
infants on their back at 6 months compared with white parents
(adjusted OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.06-0.33). One infant succumbed
to sudden infant death syndrome at 3 months of age, and another
infant died suddenly and unexpectedly at 9 months of age. Both
were bed sharing specifically with 1 adult in the former and
with 2 children in the latter. Conclusions: Bed sharing and
prone placements were more common among black infants. Breastfeeding
was infrequent in all races. This prospective study additionally
offers a unique perspective into the risk factors associated
with sudden infant death syndrome and sudden unexplained infant
death associated with bed sharing by examining the survey responses
of 2 mothers before the death of their infants combined with
a complete postmortem examination, scene analysis, and historical
investigation.
Full-text available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com
Hessol NA, Fuentes-Afflick E.
Ethnic differences in neonatal and postneonatal mortality.
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan; 115(1):e44-51.
Objective: Ethnic disparities in infant mortality
have been consistently documented in the United States, but
these disparities are poorly understood. Although the infant
mortality rate in the United States has fallen to record low
rates, since 1971 the ethnic disparity between black and white
infants has remained unchanged or increased. In 2001, the infant
mortality rate among black infants was approximately 2.5 times
higher than the rate among white and Hispanic infants. The
objective of this study was to identify ethnic differences
in neonatal and postneonatal mortality as well as the causes
and risk factors among infants born in California. Methods:
Secondary analysis was performed of 1,277,393 singleton infants
live-born to black, Latina, and white women from the California
linked birth-infant death certificate from 1995 to 1997. The
dependent variables were infant death (defined as an infant
who died in the first year of life [death <365 days]), neonatal
death (death during the first 27 days of life), and postneonatal
death (death between 28 and 364 days of life). Cause-specific
neonatal and postneonatal infant mortality rates (per 100,000
live births) were calculated for each ethnic group. Chi(2)
and exact test statistics were used to compare the distribution
of maternal and infant characteristics and cause-of-death rates
by maternal ethnicity. Logistic regression analysis was used
to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)
to estimate the relationship between maternal ethnicity, maternal
and infant factors, and risk of infant mortality. Results:
In both the neonatal and postneonatal periods, black women
had higher infant mortality rates than Latina or white women
for conditions originating in the perinatal period (including
respiratory distress syndrome) and symptoms, signs, and ill-defined
conditions (including sudden infant death syndrome). After
adjusting for maternal and infant characteristics, there were
no significant ethnic differences for neonatal mortality. For
postneonatal mortality, black women had a higher risk (OR:
1.25; 95% CI: 1.10-1.42) and Latina women had a lower risk
(OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.89) compared with white women after
adjusting for maternal and infant factors. In analyses of all
ethnic groups combined, as well as ethnic-specific analyses,
the strongest predictors of neonatal and postneonatal death
were infant birth weight of <2499 g and gestational age
of <33 weeks. Conclusions: Causes of infant mortality and
risk factors for infant mortality differed by maternal ethnicity,
indicating a need to tailor prevention and education efforts,
especially during the postneonatal period. To achieve national
infant mortality goals, health professionals and policy makers
should continue to emphasize the importance of early and continuous
prenatal care and develop new strategies to reduce the incidence
of low birth weight and premature infants. Ethnic-specific
approaches may be needed to further reduce infant mortality
rates and achieve our national goal to eliminate ethnic disparities
in perinatal outcomes.
Full-text downloading: pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/115/1/e44
Moon RY, Oden RP, Grady KC.
Back to Sleep: An educational intervention with women,
infants, and children program clients.
Pediatrics. 2004 Mar; 113(3 Pt 1):542-7.
Objective: The incidence of sudden infant
death syndrome (SIDS) is 2 to 3 times higher in the black population
compared with the US population as a whole. Prone sleeping
is also twice as prevalent in black infants. Standard modes
of communication (media, brochures) regarding the Back to Sleep
(BTS) campaign have been less effective with blacks. The objective
of this study was to determine whether a 15-minute educational
intervention is effective in changing sleep position practice
among black parents. Methods: A trained health educator led
15-minute sessions about safe infant sleep practices for groups
of 3 to 10 parents of young infants who attended a Women, Infants,
and Children clinic in Washington, DC. We performed pre- and
post session surveys, asking about sleep position, reasons
for choosing a sleep position, and knowledge of the relationship
between sleep position and SIDS. We then interviewed parents
6 months after the intervention and compared this group with
a group of parents at a different Women, Infants, and Children
site who did not receive the intervention. Results: A total
of 310 parents/caregivers participated in sessions from October
2001 to July 2002. Mothers comprised 84.5% of the participants,
fathers 6.5%, and other relatives 9.0%. Parents had a mean
age of 26.2 years (range: 15-64; standard deviation: 8.3),
and 76.5% had graduated from high school. For 51%, this was
their first child. Before the intervention, more than half
(57.7%) of infants reportedly slept on their back, with the
remainder sleeping back/side or side (15%) and prone (17.3%).
Approximately 85% (266) of infants were sleeping in the same
room as the parents. Only 28.1% of parents initially believed
that prone sleeping definitely increases the risk of SIDS.
Infants were more likely to be placed supine when previous
children were placed supine or when parents had more than a
high school education. Parents were also more likely to place
infants supine when they believed that prone increases the
risk of SIDS, they had previous knowledge of BTS, and they
were aware that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends
supine position for infants. Sleep position was not affected
by where the infant slept, number of parents in the home, presence
of a grandmother in the home, or presence of smokers in the
home. Immediately after the intervention, 85.3% planned to
place infants on the back, and 55.7% now believed that prone
definitely increases the risk of SIDS. When compared with a
control group of parents 6 months after the intervention, parents
who attended the educational intervention were more likely
to place their infants on the back (75% vs 45%), less likely
to bed share (16% vs 44.2%), less likely to cite infant comfort
as a reason for sleep position (14.5% vs 29.2%), and more likely
to be aware of BTS recommendations (72.4% vs 38.9%). Conclusions:
A 15-minute educational session with small groups of black
parents is effective in informing parents about the importance
of safe sleep position and in changing parent behavior. The
effect of the intervention is sustained throughout the first
6 months of life, when the infant is at the highest risk for
SIDS.
Full-text downloading: pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/111/2/e127
Weese-Mayer DE, Zhou L, Berry-Kravis EM,
Maher BS, Silvestri JM, Marazita ML.
Association of the serotonin transporter gene with
sudden infant death syndrome: A haplotype analysis.
Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Oct 15; 122(3):238-45.
Serotonergic receptor binding in the arcuate
nucleus, n. raphe obscurus, and other medullary regions is
decreased in sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases. Further,
an insertion/deletion polymorphism in the promoter region of
the serotonin transporter protein (5-HTT) gene has recently
been associated with risk of SIDS. This polymorphism differentially
regulates 5-HTT expression, with the long allele (L), the SIDS-associated
allele, being a more effective promoter than the short allele
(S). To further elucidate the role of the 5-HTT gene in SIDS,
we investigated the 5-HTT intron 2 polymorphism, which also
differentially regulates 5-HTT expression with the 12 repeat
allele being the more effective promoter. In a cohort of 90
SIDS cases (44 African-American and 46 Caucasian) and gender/ethnicity-matched
controls, significant positive associations were found between
SIDS and the intron 2 genotype distribution (P-value = 0.041)
among African-American SIDS vs. African-American controls,
specifically with the 12/12 genotype (P-value = 0.03), and
with the 12 repeat allele (P-value=0.018). The frequency of
the 12/12 genotype and 12-repeat allele was significantly different
(P < 0.001) between the African-American and Caucasian SIDS
cases. Furthermore, the promoter and intron 2 loci were in
significant linkage disequilibrium, and the L-12 haplotype
was significantly associated with SIDS in the African-American
(P = 0.002) but not Caucasian (P = 0.117) subgroups. These
results indicate a relationship between SIDS and the 12-repeat
allele of the intron 2 variable number tandem repeat of the
5-HTT gene in African-Americans, and a significant role of
the haplotype containing the 12-repeat allele and the promoter
L-allele in defining SIDS risk in African-Americans. These
data, if confirmed in larger studies, may begin to explain
the differences in SIDS incidence by ethnicity, suggest a role
for levels of 5-HTT expression in generation of SIDS susceptibility,
and provide an important tool for identifying at-risk individuals
and estimating the risk of recurrence.
For Full-text: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com
Weese-Mayer DE, Berry-Kravis EM, Maher BS,
Silvestri JM, Curran ME, Marazita ML.
Sudden infant death syndrome: Association with a
promoter polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene.
Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Mar 15; 117(3):268-74.
Serotonergic receptor binding in the arcuate
nucleus, n. raphe obscurus, and other medullary regions is
decreased in sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases. Further,
a variable tandem repeat sequence polymorphism in the promoter
region of the serotonin transporter protein (5-HTT) gene has
recently been associated with risk of SIDS in a Japanese cohort.
This polymorphism differentially regulates 5-HTT expression,
with the long allele (L), the SIDS-associated allele, being
a more effective promoter than the short allele (S). We therefore
investigated the 5-HTT promoter polymorphism in a cohort of
87 SIDS cases (43 African American and 44 Caucasian) and gender/ethnicity-matched
controls. Significant positive associations were found between
SIDS and the 5-HTT genotype distribution (P = 0.022), specifically
with the L/L genotype (P = 0.048), and between SIDS and the
5-HTT L allele (P = 0.005). There was also a significant negative
association between SIDS and the S/S genotype (P = 0.011).
The comparisons were repeated in the African American and Caucasian
subgroups. The data patterns were consistent in the subgroups,
i.e., the L/L genotype and L allele were increased in the cases,
but not all subgroup comparisons were statistically significant.
These results indicate a relationship between SIDS and the
L allele of the 5-HTT gene in African Americans and Caucasians,
and if confirmed, will provide an important tool for identifying
at-risk individuals and estimating the risk of recurrence.
Full-text available at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com
Unger B, Kemp JS, Wilkins D, Psara R, Ledbetter
T, Graham M, Case M, Thach BT.
Racial disparity and modifiable risk factors among
infants dying suddenly and unexpectedly.
Pediatrics. 2003 Feb; 111(2):E127-31.
Background: Racial disparity in rates of
death attributable to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has
been observed for many years. Despite decreased SIDS death
rates following the "Back to Sleep" intervention in 1994, this
disparity in death rates has increased. The prone sleep position,
unsafe sleep surfaces, and sharing a sleep surface with others
(bedsharing) increase the risk of sudden infant death. The
race-specific prevalence of these modifiable risk factors in
sudden unexpected infant deaths-including SIDS, accidental
suffocation (AS), and cause of death undetermined (UD)-has
not been investigated in a population-based study. Death rates
attributable to AS and UD are also higher in African Americans
(AAs) than in other races (non-AA). The potential contribution
of unsafe sleep practices to this overall disparity in death
rates is uncertain. Objective: The objective of this study
was to compare death rates attributable to SIDS and related
causes of death (AS and UD) in AA and non-AA infants and the
prevalence of unsafe sleep practices at time of death. Our
hypothesis was that there is a large racial disparity in these
modifiable risk factors at the time of death, and that public
awareness of this could lead to improved intervention strategies
to reduce the disparity in death rates. Methods: In this population-based
study, we retrospectively reviewed death-scene information
and medical examiners' investigations of deaths in St Louis
City and County between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1997.
The deaths of all infants <2 years old with the diagnoses
of SIDS, AS, or UD were included. Sleep surfaces other than
those specifically designed and approved for infant use were
termed nonstandard (adult beds, sofas, etc). Denominators for
our rate estimates were the number of births (AA and non-AA)
in St Louis City and County during the study period. Results:
The deaths of 119 infants were studied (81 AA and 38 non-AA).
SIDS rates were much higher in AA than non-AA infants (2.08
vs 0.65 per 1000 live births), as was the rate of AS (0.47
vs 0.06). There was a trend for increased deaths diagnosed
as UD in AA infants (0.36 vs 0.06). Bedsharing deaths were
nearly twice as common in AAs (67.1% vs 35.1% of deaths), as
were deaths on nonstandard sleep surfaces (79.0% vs 46.0%).
Forty-nine percent (49.1%) of all infants who died while bedsharing
were found on their backs or sides compared with 20.4% of infants
who were not bedsharing. Overall, the fraction of infants found
in these nonprone positions was not different for AA infants
and non-AA infants (43.3% vs 38.5%). In AA and non-AA infants,
factors that greatly increase the risk of bedsharing, such
as sofa sharing or all-night bedsharing, were present in all
or many bedsharing deaths. Conclusion: Among AA infants dying
suddenly and unexpectedly, the high prevalence of nonstandard
bed use and bedsharing may underlie, in part, their increased
death rates. Public health messages tailored for the AA community
have stressed first and foremost using non prone sleep positions.
The observation that there was no difference between AA and
non-AA infants in position found at death suggests that racial
disparity in sleep position is not the most important contributor
to racial disparity in death rates. The finding that more infants
died on their back or side while bedsharing than otherwise
suggests that these sleep positions are less protective when
associated with bedsharing. We conclude that public health
information tailored for the AA community should give equal
emphasis to risks and alternatives to bedsharing as to avoidance
of the prone position.
Full-text downloading at pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/111/2/e127
Moon RY, Omron R.
Determinants of infant sleep position in an urban
population.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2002 Oct; 41(8):569-73.
The incidence of SIDS has decreased by 40%
since the Back to Sleep campaign was initiated. However, the
rate of SIDS in the District of Columbia continues to be approximately
double the national rate. The purpose of this study was to
determine the prevalence and determinants of prone sleeping
among infants in the District of Columbia and to ascertain
what information is being provided to parents by health care
professionals by a cross-sectional survey of parents of infants
0-6 months of age presenting for well child care at Children's
Health Center, Children's National Medical Center, in Washington,
DC. We recruited a consecutive sample of 126 parent-infant
pairs, of which 92.9% were African-American. The average infant
was 73 days old, was 3,003 grams at birth, and was full term.
When asked how the infants were placed for sleep the night
before the interview, 34.1 % of parents had placed the infant
supine, 50.8%side, and 15.1% prone. Nearly half (48%) of infants
slept in an adult bed with the mother. More than one third
of the infants had been placed prone for sleep at least once
since hospital discharge. Most common reasons for sleeping
supine included SIDS risk reduction or health care professional
advice. Side sleepers did so primarily because of concern about
vomiting, health care provider advice, or SIDS. Infants were
placed prone primarily because the infant slept better. When
asked about information received from a health care provider,
70.6% of parents stated that they had received information
about sleep position and 64.3% about the hazards of passive
smoking. Eight parents observed nursery personnel placing their
infants prone. Only 16.7% of the total study population had
received a Back to Sleep brochure, read it, and recalled that
it recommended back sleeping. Infants were more likely to sleep
prone if there was a grandparent in the home (OR 2.9, p<0.05)
or if they were the firstborn (OR 2.17, p<0.05). Infants
were more likely to sleep supine if parents had heard a back
recommendation from a health care professional (OR 5.7, p<0.001).
Infants were least likely to sleep supine if the parents had
heard a side or a side/back recommendation (OR 0.26, p=0.001).
Infant sleep position was not ter, reading the Back to Sleep
brochure. In conclusion, more than one third (35.7%) of infants
in this predominantly African-American population have been
placed prone for sleep at least once; 15% slept prone the night
before the interview. Almost one third of parents received
no information about sleep position, but parents receiving
a verbal supine recommendation were most likely to place their
infant supine. Receiving written information did not affect
sleep position. Improved educational efforts for parents of
African-American newborns should continue to focus on encouraging
supine positioning, smoke cessation, and other safe sleep practices.
Full-text: http://www.sciencedirect.com (Not
a U.S Government Website)
Hauck FR, Moore CM, Herman SM, Donovan M,
Kalelkar M, Christoffel KK, Hoffman HJ, Rowley D.
The contribution of prone sleeping position to the racial disparity
in sudden infant death syndrome: the Chicago Infant Mortality Study.
Pediatrics. 2002 Oct; 110(4):772-80.
Background: Rates of sudden infant death
syndrome (SIDS) are over twice as high among African Americans
compared with Caucasians. Little is known, however, about the
relationship between prone sleeping, other sleep environment
factors, and the risk of SIDS in the United States and how
differences in risk factors may account for disparities in
mortality. Objective: To assess the contribution of prone sleeping
position and other potential risk factors to SIDS risk in a
primarily high-risk, urban African American population. Design,
Setting, And Population: Case-control study consisting of 260
infants ages birth to 1 year who died of SIDS between November
1993 and April 1996. The control group consists of an equal
number of infants matched on race, age, and birth weight. Prospectively
collected data from the death scene investigation and a follow-up
home interview for case infants were compared with equivalent
questions for living control participants to identify risk
factors for SIDS. Main Outcome Measures: Risk of SIDS related
to prone sleeping position adjusting for potential confounding
variables and other risk factors for SIDS, and comparisons
by race-ethnicity. Results: Three quarters of the SIDS infants
were African American. There was more than a twofold increased
risk of SIDS associated with being placed prone for last sleep
compared with the non prone positions (odds ratio [OR]: 2.4;
95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-3.7). This OR increased after
adjusting for potential confounding variables and other sleep
environment factors (OR: 4.0; 95% CI: 1.8-8.8). Differences
were found for African Americans compared with others (OR:
1.8; 95% CI: 1.2-2.6 and OR: 10.3, 95% CI: 10.3 [3.2-33.8: respectively]). The population attributable risk was 31%. Fewer
case mothers (46%) than control mothers (64%) reported being
advised about sleep position in the hospital after delivery.
Of those advised, a similar proportion of case mothers as control
mothers were incorrectly told or recalled being told to use
the prone position, but prone was recommended in a higher proportion
of black mothers (cases and controls combined) compared with
non black mothers. Conclusions: Prone sleeping was found to
be a significant risk factor for SIDS in this primarily African
American urban sample, and approximately one third of the SIDS
deaths could be attributed to this factor. Greater and more
effective educational outreach must be extended to African
American families and the health personnel serving them to
reduce prone prevalence during sleep, which appears, in part,
to contribute to the higher rates of SIDS among African American
infants.
Full-text downloading at: pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/110/4/772
Papacek EM, Collins JW Jr, Schulte NF, Goergen
C, Drolet A.
Differing postneonatal mortality rates of African-American
and white infants in Chicago: An ecologic study.
Matern Child Health J. 2002 Jun; 6(2):99-105.
Objectives: This study sought to determine
whether neighborhood impoverishment explains the racial disparity
in urban postneonatal mortality rates. Methods: Stratified
and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed
on the vital records of all African-Americans and whites born
in Chicago by means of a linked 1992-1995 computerized birth-death
file with appended 1990 U.S. census income and 1995 Chicago
Department of Public Health data. Four community-level variables
(low median family income, high rates of unemployment, homicide,
and lead poisoning) were analyzed. Communities with one or
more ecologic risk factors were classified as impoverished.
Results: The postneonatal mortality rate of African-Americans
(N = 104,656) was 7.5/1000 compared to 2.7/1000 for whites
(N = 52,954); relative risk (95% confidence interval) equaled
2.8 (2.3-3.3). Seventy-nine percent of African-American infants
compared to 9% of white infants resided in impoverished neighborhoods;
p < 0.01. In impoverished neighborhoods, the adjusted odds
ratio (controlling for infant and maternal individual-level
risk factors) of postneonatal mortality for African-American
infants equaled 1.5 (0.5-4.2). In non impoverished neighborhoods,
the adjusted odds ratio of postneonatal mortality for African-American
infants equaled 1.8 (1.1-2.9). Conclusions: We conclude that
urban African-American infants who reside in non impoverished
neighborhoods are at high risk for postneonatal mortality.
Full-text available at: http://www.springerlink.com
Pollack HA, Frohna JG.
Infant sleep placement after the back to sleep campaign.
Pediatrics. 2002 Apr; 109(4):608-14.
Objectives: The Back to Sleep campaign has
been credited with recent declines in the incidence of sudden
infant death syndrome. Using survey data for the 1996-1998
birth cohorts, this epidemiologic study examines infant sleep
position in a large, population-based sample. Data and Methods:
Data concerning infant sleep position are drawn from the 1996-1998
Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for 15 states.
Weighted multiple logistic regression analysis is used to examine
correlates of infant sleep position. Results: The prevalence
of prone infant sleeping significantly declined between 1996
and 1998 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.70; 95% confidence
interval [CI] = [0.63: 0.78]). African Americans were more
likely than non-Hispanic whites to sleep prone, (AOR = 1.45;
95% CI = 1.33,1.59), and were less likely to sleep supine (AOR
= 0.52; 95% CI = 0.48, 0.57). Hispanic/Latinos were less likely
overall than non-Hispanic whites to sleep prone (AOR = 0.81;
95% CI = 0.69, 0.95), but were also less likely to sleep supine
(AOR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.69, 0.87). Adherence to sleep position
recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics increased
sharply among Hispanic/Latino infants. Very low birth weight
infants and infants in larger families were less likely to
sleep in the recommended supine position. Infants born between
1001 and 1500 g (AOR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.57, 0.79), and extremely
low birth weight infants between 500 and 1000 g (AOR = 0.57;
95% CI = 0.45, 0.72) were especially unlikely to sleep supine.
Infants in households with more than 3 other children (AOR
= 1.72; 95% CI = 1.08, 2.74) were more likely to sleep prone.
Conclusions: The prevalence of supine infant sleep increased
between 1996 and 1998. Low adherence to sleep position recommendations
of the American Academy of Pediatrics among African Americans,
very low birth weight infants, and infants in large families
remain public health concerns.
Full-text downloading at pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/109/4/608
(Back to the Top)
|