Pacifiers and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS):
A Selected Annotated Bibliography
These articles have been selected by Resource Center staff from PubMed, a service of the National Library of Medicine that includes over 19 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles back to 1948. PubMed includes links to full text articles and other related resources.
Availability of full-text journal articles is often limited
to subscribers or through inter-library loan. Please see your
local library for copies of these articles, or view PubMed's
How
to Get the Journal Article or Partners in Information Access
for the Public Health Workforce's How
to Access Journal Articles
for more details.
Jenik AG, Vain N.
The pacifier debate.
Early Hum Dev. 2009 Sep 16. [Epub ahead of print]
A variety of studies have indicated that pacifier use lowers the risk of SIDS. Many observational studies have demonstrated a negative association between pacifier use and breastfeeding duration. However, observational studies cannot be used to determine whether the pacifier is the real cause of breastfeeding cessation. Evidence for causation can be better supplied by randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Three RCTs have been conducted on the relationship between pacifiers and breastfeeding, but each study has limitations, implying that the evidence of not causal effect can be questionated. We have recently presented the results of a large RCT which demonstrated that in mothers who are successfully breastfeeding at 2 weeks, the recommendation to offer a pacifier does not modify the prevalence of exclusive and any breastfeeding at different ages or the duration of lactation. It is therefore important that lactation consultants and international agencies reexamine their staunch position to discourage the use of pacifiers on the basis of a supposed adverse effect on the success and duration of breastfeeding.
Hanzer M, Zotter H, Sauseng W, Pichler G, Müller W, Kerbl R.
Non-Nutritive Sucking Habits in Sleeping Infants.
Neonatology. 2009 Jul 31;97(1):61-66. [Epub ahead of print]
Background: Pacifier use has been postulated to decrease the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The responsible mechanisms are, however, unclear. Objectives: Since little is known about the non-nutritive sucking (NNS) habits of infants during sleep, we investigated NNS patterns and changes of physiological parameters during NNS in sleeping infants. Methods: Polygraphic recordings were performed in 12 infants with a median age of 55 days (range 7-82) who regularly used a pacifier during sleep. Episodes of active suckling (bursts) and quiescent periods were differentiated by video observations. We evaluated the time of suckling in relation to the total time of pacifier use, the median number of bursts per min, the median duration of single bursts and the median interval between 2 sequent bursts. In 48 randomly selected bursts, we additionally analyzed changes in heart rate, respiratory frequency and oxygen saturation compared to the 10-second period preceding the burst. Results: Median sleep time with a pacifier held in mouth was 31.3 min (13.0-117.6), of which 15.5% (6.4-36.7%) was spent with active suckling. The median number of bursts per min was 2.2 (1.2-4.5). The median duration of a burst was 3 s (1-22) and the median interval between 2 bursts was 10 s (1-1,434). Heart rate, respiratory frequency and oxygen saturation did not change significantly during suckling bursts. Conclusions: This pilot study presents important data for sucking habits in pacifier users which may provide a basis for further investigations concerning the efficacy of pacifiers in SIDS prophylaxis. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Jenik AG, Vain NE, Gorestein AN, Jacobi NE; Pacifier and Breastfeeding Trial Group.Collaborators (11)
Lopez N, Rossato N, Corral G, Russo S, Degregori MC, Covas MC, Ventura S, Rodríguez S, Fariña D, Bergel E, Abadie P.
Does the recommendation to use a pacifier influence the prevalence of breastfeeding?
J Pediatr. 2009 Sep;155(3):350-4.e1. Epub 2009 May 21.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the recommendation to offer a pacifier once lactation is well established reduces the prevalence or duration of breastfeeding. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, controlled trial comprising 1021 mothers highly motivated to breastfeed whose newborns regained birth weight by 15 days. They were assigned to offer versus not to offer pacifiers. Primary outcome was prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 3 months. Main secondary outcomes were the prevalence of exclusive and any breastfeeding at different ages and duration of any breastfeeding. RESULTS: At 3 months, 85.8% infants in the offer pacifier group and 86.2% in the not offer pacifier group were exclusively breastfeeding (risk difference, 0.4%; 95% CI, -4.9%-4.1%), satisfying the pre-specified non-inferiority requirement of -7%. Furthermore, the recommendation to offer a pacifier did not produce a significant decrease in the frequency of exclusive and any breastfeeding at different ages or in the duration of lactation. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendation to offer a pacifier at 15 days does not modify the prevalence and duration of breastfeeding. Because pacifier use is associated with reduced incidence of sudden infant death syndrome, the recommendation to offer a pacifier appears safe and appropriate in similar populations.
Sexton S, Natale R.
Risks and benefits of pacifiers.
Am Fam Physician. 2009 Apr 15;79(8):681-5.
Physicians are often asked for guidance about pacifier use in children, especially regarding the benefits and risks, and when to appropriately wean a child. The benefits of pacifier use include analgesic effects, shorter hospital stays for preterm infants, and a reduction in the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Pacifiers have been studied and recommended for pain relief in newborns and infants undergoing common, minor procedures in the emergency department (e.g., heel sticks, immunizations, venipuncture). The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that parents consider offering pacifiers to infants one month and older at the onset of sleep to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Potential complications of pacifier use, particularly with prolonged use, include a negative effect on breastfeeding, dental malocclusion, and otitis media. Adverse dental effects can be evident after two years of age, but mainly after four years. The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends that mothers be educated about pacifier use in the immediate postpartum period to avoid difficulties with breastfeeding. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians recommend weaning children from pacifiers in the second six months of life to prevent otitis media. Pacifier use should not be actively discouraged and may be especially beneficial in the first six months of life.
Vennemann MM, Bajanowski T, Brinkmann B, Jorch G, Sauerland C, Mitchell EA; GeSID Study Group.Collaborators (26)
Bach P, Bockholt B, Bohnert M, Cremer U, Deml U, Freislederer A, Heide S, Huckenbeck W, Jachau K, Kaatsch HJ, Klein A, Kleemann WJ, Larsch KP, Fiegut A, Fischer D, Leukel W, Rauch E, Paulus W, Penning R, Rublack F, Sauerland C, Schlaud M, Schmidt B, Sperhake J, Zimmer G, Zweihoff R.
Sleep environment risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome: the German Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Study.
Pediatrics. 2009 Apr;123(4):1162-70.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to investigate the risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome in the infants' sleep environment for a population in which few infants sleep prone as a result of education campaigns. METHODS: This was a population-based sudden infant death syndrome case-control study over 3 years (1998-2001) in Germany. RESULTS: There were 333 sudden infant death syndrome cases and 998 matched controls. Although only 4.1% of the infants were placed prone to sleep, those infants were at a high risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Those who were unaccustomed to sleeping prone were at very high risk, as were those who turned to prone. Bed sharing (especially for infants younger than 13 weeks); duvets; sleeping prone on a sheepskin; sleeping in the house of a friend or a relative (compared with sleeping in the parental home); and sleeping in the living room (compared with sleeping in the parental bedroom) increased the risk for sudden infant death syndrome; pacifier use during the last sleep was associated with a significantly reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: This study has clarified the risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome in a population where few infants sleep prone. This study supports the current recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics. This study has identified several novel risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome: an increased risk if the infants sleeps outside the parental home, death in the living room, and the high risk when sleeping prone on a sheepskin; however, because the numbers of cases in these groups are small, additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Hanzer M, Zotter H, Sauseng W, Pfurtscheller K, Müller W, Kerbl R.
Pacifier use does not alter the frequency or duration of spontaneous arousals in sleeping infants.
Sleep Med. 2009 Apr;10(4):464-70. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
OBJECTIVE: It has been reported that pacifiers might reduce the risk of SIDS by favouring infants' arousability from sleep. We evaluated the influence of a pacifier on the frequency and duration of spontaneous arousals in healthy infants. METHODS: Polygraphic recordings were performed in 14 infants with an age of 51.7+/-19.9 days (means+/-SD) who regularly used a pacifier during sleep. Cortical and subcortical arousals were scored according to the recommendations of the "International Paediatric Work Group on Arousals." The number of arousals per 10-min-period and the duration of arousals were determined for periods of pacifier use as well as for periods after pacifier dislodgement and were compared with the data of 10 control infants (age 49.8+/-16.5 days) who never used a pacifier. RESULTS: Altogether, 211 arousals in pacifier users and 225 arousals in non-users were scored. In pacifier users, 2.0+/-1.6 arousals per 10-min-period with a duration of 12.2+/-3.0 s occurred during pacifier use, and 1.7+/-1.6 arousals per 10-min-period with a duration of 12.2+/-3.1s occurred during periods without pacifier. In pacifier non-users, 2.3+/-1.2 arousals per 10-min-period (duration 13.9+/-2.9s) were scored. The results did not show a significant difference concerning frequency and duration of spontaneous arousals between pacifier users and non-users. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that factors other than arousal mechanisms might be responsible for the efficacy of pacifiers in SIDS prophylaxis.
Tonkin SL, Vogel SA, Gunn AJ.
Upper airway size while sucking on a pacifier in an infant with micrognathia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Jan;44(1-2):78-9.
In an infant with micrognathia, who was being evaluated after an apparent life-threatening event, respiration timed lateral radiographs showed an increase in the width of the middle airway space during inspiration from 2 mm without the pacifier to 9 mm while sucking on a pacifier. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that the well-documented association between the pacifier use and reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome may be at least in part related to changes in airway size.
Marter A, Agruss JC.
Pacifiers: an update on use and misuse.
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Oct;12(4):278-85.
PURPOSE: The use of pacifiers is a controversial topic; this article looks at the subject from both a historical and cultural perspective, with a review of current research. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pacifiers in infants older than 1 month is currently recommended by multiple researchers to prevent sudden infant death syndrome, and is associated with other benefits for premature infants. However, pacifier use has also been associated with higher risk of otitis media. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Knowledge of the most recent evidence will enable providers to communicate appropriate guidelines on pacifier use to families.
Damato EG.
Safe sleep: can pacifiers reduce SIDS risk?
Nurs Womens Health. 2007 Feb;11(1):72-6.
Comment in: Nurs Womens Health. 2007 Aug;11(4):355; author reply 355-6.
In November 2005, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) (2005) released updated recommendations regarding sleep environment modifications aimed at reducing the risk of SIDS. Probably, the most controversial part of the updated guidelines involves the recommendation to offer a pacifier at nap time and bedtime to infants through the first year of life. To help nurses counsel new parents on infant care practices, this article presents a review of what's known about SIDS and about how pacifiers are believed to affect risk, and a discussion of the strengths and limitations of the research findings and of potential disadvantages related to pacifier use.
Soxman JA.
Non-nutritive sucking with a pacifier: pros and cons.
Gen Dent. 2007 Jan-Feb;55(1):59-62; quiz 63, 79-80.
The detrimental effects of prolonged pacifier use on the developing oral structures are often the primary focus of dental professionals; however, non-nutritive sucking with a pacifier has other consequences that include not only harmful effect but positive influences as well. This article will address some of the issues for consideration regarding the use of pacifiers and provide information for appropriate recommendations to parents of infants and toddlers regarding the use and cessation of non-nutritive sucking with a pacifier.
Tonkin SL, Lui D, McIntosh CG, Rowley S,
Knight DB, Gunn AJ.
Effect of pacifier use on mandibular position in
preterm infants.
Acta Paediatr. 2007 Aug 20; [Epub ahead of print].
Aim: It has been hypothesized that the association
of pacifier use with reduced risk of sudden infant death is
mediated by forward movement of the mandible and tongue that
helps open the upper airway. Our aim was to examine whether
the mandible is moved forward when an infant is sucking on
a pacifier, and if so, whether the mandible remains advanced
after the pacifier is removed. Methods: In sixty clinically
stable premature infants (corrected gestation age 36.5 +/-
0.3 weeks, mean +/- SEM) the distance from each ear where the
pinna met the cheek to the most prominent point of the chin
was measured bilaterally, and the average was used as an index
of mandibular position. Mandibular position was determined
before and after allowing the infants to suck on a pacifier
for 10-15 min, and after removing the pacifier. Results: There
was a significant forward movement of the mandible when the
infants were sucking on the pacifier (59.5 +/- 0.7 vs. 58.6
+/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.001), with no significant change after the
pacifier was removed. Conclusions: Pacifier use in preterm
infants was associated with a small significant forward displacement
of the jaw. These data suggest that pacifier use may help protect
the upper airway.
Comina E, Marion K, Renaud FN, Dore J, Bergeron
E, Freney J.
Pacifiers: A microbial reservoir.
Nurs Health Sci. 2006 Dec; 8(4):216-23.
The permanent contact between the nipple
part of pacifiers and the oral microflora offers ideal conditions
for the development of biofilms. This study assessed the microbial
contamination on the surface of 25 used pacifier nipples provided
by day-care centers. Nine were made of silicone and 16 were
made of latex. The biofilm was quantified using direct staining
and microscopic observations followed by scraping and microorganism
counting. The presence of a biofilm was confirmed on 80% of
the pacifier nipples studied. This biofilm was mature for 36%
of them. Latex pacifier nipples were more contaminated than
silicone ones. The two main genera isolated were Staphylococcus
and Candida. Our results confirm that nipples can be seen as
potential reservoirs of infections. However, pacifiers do have
some advantages; in particular, the potential protection they
afford against sudden infant death syndrome. Strict rules of
hygiene and an efficient antibiofilm cleaning protocol should
be established to answer the worries of parents concerning
the safety of pacifiers.
Thompson JM, Thach BT, Becroft DM, Mitchell
EA
Sudden infant death syndrome: Risk factors for infants
found face down differ from other SIDS cases.
J Pediatr. 2006 Nov;149(5):630-633.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that infants
with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) found face down (FD)
would have SIDS risk factors different from those found in
other positions (non-face-down position, NFD). STUDY DESIGN:
We used the New Zealand Cot Death Study data, a 3-year, nationwide
(1987 to 1990), case-control study. Odds ratios (univariate
and multivariate) for FD (n = 154) and NFD SIDS (n = 239) were
estimated separately, and statistical differences between the
two groups were assessed. RESULTS: Of 12 risk factors for SIDS,
there were 8 with a statistically significant difference between
FD and NFD infants. After adjustment for the potential confounders,
younger infant age, Maori ethnicity, low birth weight, prone
sleep position, use of a sheepskin, and pillow use were all
associated with a greater risk of SIDS in the FD than the NFD
group. Sleeping during the nighttime, maternal smoking, and
bed-sharing were associated with a risk of SIDS only in the
NFD group. Pacifier use was associated with a decreased risk
for SIDS only in the NFD group, whereas being found with the
head covered was associated with a decreased risk for SIDS
for the FD group. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with SIDS in the FD
position appear to be a distinct subgroup of SIDS. These differences
in risk factors provide clues to mechanisms of death in both
SIDS subtypes.
Joanna Briggs Institute
Early childhood pacifier use in relation to breastfeeding,
SIDS, infection and dental malocclusion.
Nurs Stand. 2006 May 31-Jun 6; 20(38):52-5.
This information on best practice is based
on a systematic review (Callaghan et al 2005) conducted by
the Institute Nurses' Network (Telethon Institute of Child
Health Research), Western Australian community and child health
nurses and the Western Australian Centre for Evidence Based
Nursing and Midwifery, a collaborating centre of the Joanna
Briggs Institute. The primary references on which this information
is based are available online via Blackwell Synergy: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com and
to members of the institute via the web site: http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au
Li DK, Willinger M, Petitti DB, Odouli R,
Liu L, Hoffman HJ.
Use of a dummy (pacifier) during sleep and risk of
sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): population based case-control
study.
BMJ. 2006 Jan 7; 332(7532):18-22. E-pub 2005 Dec 9.
Objectives: To examine the association between
use of a dummy (pacifier) during sleep and the risk of sudden
infant death syndrome (SIDS) in relation to other risk factors.
Design: Population based case-control study. Setting: Eleven
counties in California. Participants: Mothers or carers of
185 infants whose deaths were attributed to SIDS and 312 randomly
selected controls matched for race or ethnicity and age. Main
outcome Measures: Use of a dummy during sleep determined through
interviews. Results: The adjusted odds ratio for SIDS associated
with using a dummy during the last sleep was 0.08 (95% confidence
interval 0.03 to 0.21). Use was associated with a reduction
in risk in every category of sociodemographic characteristics
and risk factors examined. The reduced risk associated with
use seemed to be greater with adverse sleep conditions (such
as sleeping prone or on side and sleeping with a mother who
smoked), although the observed interactions were not significant.
In addition, use of a dummy may reduce the impact of other
risk factors for SIDS, especially those related to adverse
sleep environment. For example, infants who did not use a dummy
and slept prone or on their sides (v on their back) had an
increased risk of SIDS (2.61, 1.56 to 4.38). In infants who
used dummies, there was no increased risk associated with sleeping
position (0.66, 0.12 to 3.59). While cosleeping with a mother
who smoked was also associated with increased risk of SIDS
among infants who did not use a dummy (4.5, 1.3 to 15.1), there
was no such association among those who did (1.1, 0.1 to 13.4).
Conclusions: Use of a dummy seems to reduce the risk of SIDS
and possibly reduces the influence of known risk factors in
the sleep environment.
American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force
on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
The changing concept of sudden infant death syndrome:
Diagnostic coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping
environment, and new variables to consider in reducing risk.
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov; 116(5):1245-55. E-pub 2005 Oct 10.
There has been a major decrease in the incidence
of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) since the American Academy
of Pediatrics (AAP) released its recommendation in 1992 that
infants be placed down for sleep in a non prone position. Although
the SIDS rate continues to fall, some of the recent decrease
of the last several years may be a result of coding shifts
to other causes of unexpected infant deaths. Since the AAP
published its last statement on SIDS in 2000, several issues
have become relevant, including the significant risk of side
sleeping position; the AAP no longer recognizes side sleeping
as a reasonable alternative to fully supine sleeping. The AAP
also stresses the need to avoid redundant soft bedding and
soft objects in the infant's sleeping environment, the hazards
of adults sleeping with an infant in the same bed, the SIDS
risk reduction associated with having infants sleep in the
same room as adults and with using pacifiers at the time of
sleep, the importance of educating secondary caregivers and
neonatology practitioners on the importance of "back to sleep," and
strategies to reduce the incidence of positional plagiocephaly
associated with supine positioning. This statement reviews
the evidence associated with these and other SIDS-related issues
and proposes new recommendations for further reducing SIDS
risk.
Hauck FR, Omojokun OO, Siadaty MS.
Do pacifiers reduce the risk of sudden infant death
syndrome? A meta-analysis.
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov; 116(5):e716-23. E-pub 2005 Oct 10.
Objective: Pacifier use has been reported
to be associated with a reduced risk of sudden infant death
syndrome (SIDS), but most countries around the world, including
the United States, have been reluctant to recommend the use
of pacifiers because of concerns about possible adverse effects.
This meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify and evaluate
the protective effect of pacifiers against SIDS and to make
a recommendation on the use of pacifiers to prevent SIDS. Methods:
We searched the Medline database (January 1966 to May 2004)
to collect data on pacifier use and its association with SIDS,
morbidity, or other adverse effects. The search strategy included
published articles in English with the Medical Subject Headings
terms "sudden infant death syndrome" and "pacifier" and the
keywords "dummy" and "soother." Combining searches resulted
in 384 abstracts, which were all read and evaluated for inclusion.
For the meta-analysis, articles with data on the relationship
between pacifier use and SIDS risk were limited to published
original case-control studies, because no prospective observational
reports were found; 9 articles met these criteria. Two independent
reviewers evaluated each study on the basis of the 6 criteria
developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force
on Infant Positioning and SIDS; in cases of disagreement, a
third reviewer evaluated the study, and a consensus opinion
was reached. We developed a script to calculate the summary
odds ratio (SOR) by using the reported ORs and respective confidence
intervals (CI) to weight the ORs. We then pooled them together
to compute the SOR. We performed the Breslow-Day test for homogeneity
of ORs, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for the null hypothesis
of no effect (OR = 1), and the Mantel-Haenszel common OR estimate.
The consistency of findings was evaluated and the overall potential
benefits of pacifier use were weighed against the potential
risks. Our recommendation is based on the taxonomy of the 5-point
(A-E) scale adopted by the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Results: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis.
The SOR calculated for usual pacifier use (with univariate
ORs) is 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-1.03) and
0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.85) with multivariate ORs. For pacifier
use during last sleep, the SORs calculated using univariate
and multivariate ORs are 0.47 (95% CI: 0.40-0.55) and 0.39
(95% CI: 0.31-0.50), respectively. Conclusions: Published case-control
studies demonstrate a significant reduced risk of SIDS with
pacifier use, particularly when placed for sleep. Encouraging
pacifier use is likely to be beneficial on a population-wide
basis: 1 SIDS death could be prevented for every 2733 (95%
CI: 2416-3334) infants who use a pacifier when placed for sleep
(number needed to treat), based on the US SIDS rate and the
last-sleep multivariate SOR resulting from this analysis. Therefore,
we recommend that pacifiers be offered to infants as a potential
method to reduce the risk of SIDS. The pacifier should be offered
to the infant when being placed for all sleep episodes, including
daytime naps and nighttime sleeps. This is a US Preventive
Services Task Force level B strength of recommendation based
on the consistency of findings and the likelihood that the
beneficial effects will outweigh any potential negative effects.
In consideration of potential adverse effects, we recommend
pacifier use for infants up to 1 year of age, which includes
the peak ages for SIDS risk and the period in which the infant's
need for sucking is highest. For breastfed infants, pacifiers
should be introduced after breastfeeding has been well established.
Nelson EA, Yu LM, Williams S; International
Child Care Practices Study Group Members.
International Child Care Practices study: Breastfeeding
and pacifier use.
J Hum Lact. 2005 Aug; 21(3):289-95.
Although the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative
advises that no pacifiers be given to breastfeeding infants,
both breastfeeding and pacifier use may protect against sudden
infant death syndrome. The International Child Care Practice
Study data set on child care practices associated with sudden
infant death syndrome risk from 21 centers in 17 countries
was used to describe infant-feeding practices and pacifier
use and assess factors associated with breastfeeding. At approximately
3 months of age, rates of breastfeeding only (4%-80%) and pacifier
use (12.5%-71%) varied between centers. Pacifier use was negatively
associated with breastfeeding, and a dose-response effect was
noted. Other negative (multiple birth, smoking by mother) and
positive (intention to breastfeed, bed sharing, mothers' education)
associations with breastfeeding only were identified. Although
causality should not be inferred, these associations are consistent
with previous studies. Advice on pacifiers should include potential
benefits as well as risks.

September 2009